THE SCOURGE OF AI DECEPTION

There has never been a more robust public conversation around artificial intelligence and ethics than since the late summer of 2022. That was when a small handful of tech companies made the first proprietary text-to-image AI art generators available to the public. For the unfamiliar, the growing field of AI art refers to machine learning platforms trained on vast amounts of text and visual data scraped from the Internet, which, when combined with text-to-image technology, allow users to describe any scene at all in regular language – meaning, human as opposed to computer programming languages, and have it output any number of amazing images based on these text prompts.

The fact of AI is already being a part of everyday life aside, the emer­gence and swift evolution of specific technology that allows people to create visuals in seconds using text prompts has generated a huge and contentious debate in the art world and creative industries. Many of its detractors call it a job killer for human artists, while supporters herald it as the most revolutionary thing to happen to visual media since the invention of photography.

One of the most concerning aspects of the many questionable uses of AI is the creation of deepfakes and faux-documentaries. This hyper-realistic alternative vision raises the question of the integ­rity of the future historical record, given that apparently “documentary” images can be fabricated in this way. Given that anyone can now create fictional historical documentary with near-perfect accuracy and since the viral nature of image sharing on the Internet does not lend itself readily to fact checking, it isn’t hard to draw the conclusion that, without strong critical media skills, it will become increasingly difficult for laypeople, or even veteran media practitioners, to tell reality from the manufactured.

Here we look at some of the disturbing “documentaries” originating mainly in the United States about Peter which claim to have privileged insight into his life and and career.

It will doubtless come as no surprise to learn that ‘Hollywood Confidential’, who joined You Tube in December 2025, is both faceless and uncontactable. Based on their logo (see top of this page), it would appear they are representative of the more militant wing of the LGBTQ+ community who feel it’s their duty to ‘out’ dead actors who are no longer able to confirm or deny the allegation.

The individuals behind Hollywood Confidential go on to tell us the following: “During Hollywood’s Golden Age, being gay was not a private matter — it was a career-ending threat. Studios enforced silence. Relationships were erased. Marriages were staged. Love was hidden behind contracts. Behind the screen idols were real relationships — shared homes, shared lives, and shared secrets — hidden to preserve an illusion of masculinity America demanded. It is a historical record of gay erasure in classic cinema. If you want to understand Old Hollywood as it truly was — not as it pretended to be — this channel opens the files they tried to destroy. Hollywood Confidential — the gay history Hollywood denied.”

I would be interested to see the “files” these people have supposedly opened to expose this rubbish. As previously stated, all they’ve done is trawl the internet for any bit of tabloid tittle-tattle and unsubstantiated online gossip, which is then passed off as an extensively researched exposé. In reality, it’s poorly created, utterly misleading and excruciating in every sense of the word. If it was a horse, someone would surely show the poor creature some pity and put it out of its misery!

While there will always be a small number of credulous people out there who will believe every word of this trash, I would suggest that no one with an ounce of intelligence could possibly be taken in by this kind of grubby nonsense. That said, it’s really sad that the technology which is now become so readily available online is being used to create the kind of unadulterated junk as discussed here.

They claim to be taking viewers on a nostalgic journey to reveal rare stories, unseen footage, iconic legends, vintage scandals, and the timeless beauty of Hollywood’s past – with emphasis, of course, on the “scandal” bit. Not a single long-dead actor is left unmolested. Amongst those having their names dragged through the mud are Richard Burton, Peter O’Toole, Sid James, Oliver Reed, Bill Maynard(!), Stewart Granger and our own Peter Wyngarde.

They entice the curious and incurably gullible to “hit that subscribe button and step back into a world where style, drama, and artistry ruled the screen.” Really? To anyone with a modicum of intelligence, however, this channel is merely a platform from which to blacken the names of departed actors and actresses who can no longer can defend themselves.

‘Pure Evil: 15 British Celebrities of the 70s Who Scandalized the World!’ ‘ is the title of the sudo-documentary in focus here where, lumped in with the likes of serial paedophiles, Jimmy Saville and Rolf Harris, is our own Peter Wyngarde, it’s claimed, coerced, abused and generally drove his fellow thespians, producers and directors to the point of suicide! All this, it’s asserted,, is “well-documented”,. but given that none of these ‘documents’ are ever produced, we’re just expected to accept their word.

Needless to say, all these assertions are lies upon lies upon lies; manufactured by a person or persons unknown, who are so absolutely certain of what they’re saying, they choose to obscure themselves behind a username and remain uncontactable.

In direct opposition to the claims made by those behind ‘Vintage Uncovered’, Peter was in fact greatly respected within the acting profession, with many of his fellow actors and producers singing his praises – both as an actor and man. Here are just a few of the quotes about him:

“I always felt that any success the show (Department ‘S’) had was due in no small part to Peter’s ability and imagination He was a fabulous actor and a good pal.” Joel Fabiani – Co-Star, Department S

“I remember working with Peter was always fun – he is such a stylish actor. He was a true gentleman..” Dame Diana Rigg – Actress

“Working with Peter was a scream – he’s such a hoot!” Felicity Kendal – Actress

“He was funny and quick and bright. I think the professionals are professionals, and he’s one of those. He hasn’t any inflated idea’s about himself. He’s completely unpompous, and I didn’t find him the least bit phoney.” David Bailey – Photographer

“Peter was always a very courteous man, easy to work with, and who behaved off screen with the same suave sophistication that some of his on-screen roles demanded.” Dennis Spooner – Producer, Department S/Jason King

“Peter Wyngarde played Langdale Pike – a Victorian Nigel Dempster in ‘The Three Gables’, which opened the 1994 season of ‘The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes’. As always, Peter was distinguished by his rapier wit and style. A memorable performance.” June Wyndham-Davis – Producer, ‘The Three Gables’

The creators of this abomination should hang their heads in shame, ‘tho somehow I doubt they ever will!

Conclusion

POSTERS

*Woolies (Woolworths): was a British high street retail chain.

FLASH GORDON: Some of our scenes are missing!

There has long been talk amongst fans about a scene involving the arrest of Princess Aura by General Klytus on her return to Mongo City after putting Flash Gordon in the care of Prince Barin in Arboria. Only a a handful of photographs and the inclusion of the sequence in both the first (12th June 1979) and final (July 1979) drafts of Lorenzo Semple’s script, and in the shooting schedules prove its existence, as it was inevitably to end up on the cutting room floor before the film was released in 1980.

White Robes?

SCENESCRIPTSCREEN
Inside the great hall where Flash, Dale and Zarkhov are brought before Ming, Vultan and Barin draw their weapons.“Put up your weapons. Nobody dies in the palace but by the Emperor’s command”“Set down your weapons. No one, but no one dies in the palace without a command from the Emperor.”
Scene as above. Vultan initially refuses to follow Kytus’s instruction . There is no dialogue at all from Klytus at this point.“Vultan! You obey or you sacrifice your daughter.”
In the prison cell where Flash is awaiting execution.(To Flash): “You refused your final meal. The chef is very upset.”“Yes, you don’t look well. I heard you refused your final meal. The chef will be upset.”
Same scene as above.“You were wise, actually — the gas works more quickly on an empty stomach. Have you any final requests?”“Just as well. Gas works more quickly on an empty stomach. Any final requests?”
Inside the laboratory where Klytus and Aura are removing all Zarkov’s memories. The two General’s are watching the screen, when Klytus sees Hitler.There is no dialogue here. “Now he showed promise!”
Scene as above. The procedure has been done.(To Kala): “I will return after reporting to the Emperor.” (Seen holding Aura’s handkerchief).“I’ll return.” (No handkerchief. He touches Kala’s chin).
Torture Chamber. Aura demands to see her father, (Klytus touches a button to reveal Ming). No dialogue“With pleasure.”
Klytus has arrived at the Hawkmen’s Sky City. “Agent Zarkov, you will be liquidated for treachery. As for you, Prince Vultan, you will surrender these fugitives at once or the Imperial Fleet will blast your kingdom to atoms.”“Agent Zarkov, you will be liquidated for treachery.
Scene as above. Barin insists that Klytus address him as “Prince Barin”.

See below for page from original script
“No longer, I think. Princess Aura — under our persuasion — has implicated you of high treason. You are under arrest along with these Earthlings. A prison ship will be along shortly to take you away.”“No longer. Princess Aura — under our persuasion — has implicated you of high treason. You are under arrest. A prison ship will be along shortly to take you away.”

REVIEW: Aladdin

Presented by Paul Elliot at His Majesty’s Theatre, Aberdeen – 7th December 1984 – 5th January 1985.

Character: Abarnazar

  • Scene 1: In old Pekin
  • Scene 2: Outside Pekin
  • Scene 3: The Princess’s garden
  • Scene 5: Outside Pekin
  • Scene 6: A ravine in the mountains

Act Two

  • Scene 2: Widow Twankey’s Launderette
  • Scene 3: Outside Pekin
  • Scene 4: The Garden of Aladdin’s Palace

REVIEW: Turn Out The Lights – ‘The Boyhood Haunt’

Broadcast: 6th January, 1967

Character: Richard Merlin

Some Background

The Episode

‘The Boyhood Haunt’ was the first of just 5 episodes of ‘Turn Out The Lights’ to be screened by ITV.

ALBUM LYRICS: The songs that didn’t make the final cut

Please be reminded that all the lyrics below are copyrighted to Tina-Wyngarde-Hopkins and Bowington Management.

3 Marie

(Spoken as if drunk)

What is all this fuss o’er Xmas
s’cuse us is it to do with – love
Why is everyone so sexless
he must have had some fun above
 
After all it is his birthday
no one’s born without someone’s horn
Proclaiming it is a mirth day
and the night is no time to mourn
But time to have more jollity
And practise his philosophy
Turning to other cheek rapidly
for kisses from the majority
 
Good will and love for all men
let’s all have a cuddle and a drink
Even that loner in No.10
Might make that cheek turn quite pink
 
All that matters is for us to love
give the old world a piece of dove
Have one another, sod givin’ (I’m drunk)
a’int we all God’s chill’un

5 Robinson Crusoe’s Story

7 To Call A Man A Man – Is A State of Grace

8 Why Do Taxi Drivers Talk So Much?

ARTICLE: Department S – The best set of cars on TV

Written by Mar­tin Buckley

Classic Sports Car: 1st January, 2026

HOW TROLLS LIKE THESE ARE DESTROYING FANDOM

Interview by Brian Grant 

*British toilet paper brand famed for it’s advertisements featuring Labrador pups.
*A ‘Bob’: British colloquialism for a Shilling in pre-decimalised UK currency.

“Don’t worry, Prime Minister. When it goes t*ts up, it’s the idiots in charge of the quango who’ll take the blame!”  “Sir Humphry, you’re a genius!”

*’Strictly Come Dancing’. BBC television show.
*British colloquialism for a police informant.

 And…      

*Incitatus was the notorious Emperor’s horse.
*Tetley’s: British tea brand.

*A Brew: Colloquial English for a cup of tea.
  • 1: I couldn’t be a**ed and,
  • 2. The prospect of him responding with another dose of electronically delivered anesthetic was not at all desirable, regardless of its comic value.”

“He was from the tip of South-West England, which isn’t exactly the end of the world, but you can probably see it from there. With his severe buzz-cut and Japanese sniper specs which looked as if they’d been fashioned from secondhand reentry shields, he had all the charisma of a lavatory brush.”

While he’d make a number of very serious allegations about Tina and Thomas via social media, rather than put his real name to these claims, he instead adopted the name of someone from Tina’s book, ‘Peter Wyngarde: A Life Amongst Strangers‘ to secrete himself behind.       

*Marks and Spencer. A well-known British fashion, homeware and food retailer.

“Most people would find it difficult to make sense of the types that join online hate mobs, but then idiots like those spoken of here simply don’t have the same emotions and feelings as the rest of us. The individuals that chose to leap aboard Mr. W’s rickety three-wheeled bandwagon were sad, middle-aged men with beer bellies and comb-overs whose wives probably paid them to go out. There was, however, at least one woman amongst them – namely Ms. Z (delegated Minister for Paperclips): an old boiler with the voice of a Klaxon and a face as hard as a dressed crab. She’d been prowling the touchline for some time with shades of a KGB agent eavesdropping at a Leningrad bus stop. I wouldn’t describe her as a dung beetle exactly – more something a dung beetle might eat! She came across as the type that no one had ever taken the slightest scrap of notice of her entire life, including her ‘partner’ – a keen fisherman by all accounts – who’d apparently rather sit dangling his tackle into a freezing canal than spend time with her. Now suddenly she was a great white shark in a goldfish bowl. For the first time in her pointless existence there was a group of mindless clowns who were not only willing to acknowledge her, but who were actually prepared to listen to what she had to say.   

“Tina’s life story of Peter is a must-read from the one who knew him best.”

Sam J. Jones

*Arthur Daley and Terry McCann – the two main characters in ‘Minder’.

“They obviously expected us to come crawling, cap in hand, while declaring unconditional surrender. Again, this demonstrated their boundless conceit. These people had written themselves into our story, then felt we owed them something. It seemed their collective egos required someone to bend the knee to them, when what they really needed was the Wizard of Oz! ”   

Thank you to Ryan Church for the above. Sent to him by Google after he lodged a complaint about the contents of ‘The Covens’ website.

Despite the horrendous abuse and harassment, there were a few moments of hilarity. I suspect that most right-minded people would find the following both hilarious and pitiful in equal measure, if only for the rank stupidity of the perpetrator. It would involve Mr. Y attempting to take the public for fools by posting a yarn on his website about a British Gas engineer who had, purportedly, visited Tina’s parent’s home to carry out work on their central heating boiler (this despite the fact that her parents home is heated solely by electricality!). By an absolutely mind-boggling quirk of fate this engineer, it was claimed, happened to be a card-carrying member of ‘The Coven’! The odds of this happening must have been, well, astronomical!     

Do you think these bullies will have moved on to someone else by now?       

“It’s really quite frightening to consider, given the lengths to which they went to over this, what Mr. X and his hired guns might’ve been capable of if we had done something to offend them personally. X certainly didn’t cover himself in glory here, and rather than discrediting us, he succeeded only in debasing himself. He certainly has no justification in peering down his snout at anyone else after this performance.

“I’ve always maintained that sunshine is the best disinfectant”

The National Stalking Helpline:
0808 802 0300

https://www.suzylamplugh.org/Pages/Category/national-stalking-helpline
Practical advice and information to anyone who is currently or previously been effected by harassment or stalking.

Victim Supportline:
0808 168 9111
www.victimsupport.org.uk
Helpline for anyone affected by crime

REVIEW: Hamlet

A Festival of Britain Production by arrangement with Bronson Albery production. Sherek Players Ltd. (in association with he Arts Council of Great Britain).

Opened at The New Theatre, London – Thursday, May 17th 1951.

Character: Voltimand and Third Player (Lucianus in the “play within a play”)

  • Scene 1: Elsinore, A platform before he castle.
  • Scene 2: A room of state in the castle.
  • Scene 3: A room in Polonius’ house.
  • Scene 4: The platform.
  • Scene 5: Another part of the platform.
  • Scene 1: A room in Polonius’ house.
  • Scene 2: A room in the castle.

Act 3:

  • Scene 1: A room in the castle.
  • Scene 2: A hall in the castle.
  • Scene 3: A room in the castle.
  • Scene 4: The Queen’s closet.

Act 4:

  • Scene 1: A room in the castle.
  • Scene 2: Another room in the castle.
  • Scene 3: Another room in the castle.
  • Scene 4: A plain in Denmark.
  • Scene 5: Elsinore. A room in the castle.
  • Scene 6: Another room in the castle.
  • Scene 7: Another room in the castle.
  • Scene 1: A churchyard.
  • Scene 2: A hall in the castle.

Some Background

The sets, which one critic described as a “formal and rather bleak affair” were, again, at Guinness’ behest, as he had disliked the semi-permanent and realistic sets he’d seen in other productions of Shakespeare. he’d wanted a suggestion of reality here and there, and came to the conclusion that each scene could be played round, or influenced by, one or two specific real things – for instance, the battlement scene round a Tudor cannon, the Polonius household a table with a globe and papers, the main court scenes dominated by a large Renaissance classical doorway, and for the rest blackness and open wings. This did not work out overly well, and was not put to the best use.

Very little of the play was cut. Retrospectively, Guinness believed this to a misjudgement. He said it occurred later that perhaps Elizabethan audiences were able to stomach long entertainments for the simple reason that they were in the open air. He’d followed Granville-Barker’s advice and did not drop the curtain, as is usual, at the end of the ” Rogue and peasant slave ” soliloquy. This, he said, turned out to be the only “daring”, original and exciting thing they did in the whole production, with immense results, and it escaped the critics’ notice!

Alec Guinness later wrote an article in the Spectator, explaining why he felt the play had been such a disappointment.

A Synopsis

The Costumes

All the costumes for the play were designed by the Spanish Spanish painter, drawer, enamelling master, sculptor, and stage designer, Mariano Andreu. John Gielgud saw his work and invited Andreu to create the costumes and settings for Much Ado About Nothing at Stratford-upon-Avon in 1949. The production was a great success and was toured and revived in Stratford and London. Andreu went on to design a number of productions in Britain during the 1950s, including All’s Well That Ends Well at Stratford, and Berlioz’s opera The Trojans at the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden.

(Left) Andreu’s original design of Peter’s costume -worn as the ‘Third Player’. The painting is part of the V&A’s Theatrical Collection.

REVIEW: As You Like It

  • Scene 1: Orchard of Oliver’s house.
  • Scene 2: Lawn before the Duke’s palace.
  • Scene 3: A room in the palace.
  • Scene 1: The Forest of Arden.
  • Scene 2: A room in the palace.
  • Scene 3: Before Oliver’s house.
  • Scene 4: The Forest of Arden.
  • Scene 5: The forest.
  • Scene 6: The forest.
  • Scene 7: The forest.
  • Scene 1: A room in the palace.
  • Scene 2: The forest.
  • Scene 3: The forest.
  • Scene 4: The forest.
  • Scene 5: Another part of the forest.
  • Scene 1: The forest.
  • Scene 2: The forest.
  • Scene 3: The forest.
  • Scene 1: The forest.
  • Scene 2: The forest.
  • Scene 3: The forest.
  • Scene 4: The forest.

Some Background

There was a major difference between this production of Shakespeare’s ‘As You Like it’ and the earlier BBC staging in1946, and that was the presence in the cast of major actors such as Margaret Leighton, Michael Hordern and Laurence Harvey. The program notes for the music are especially revealing in their scholarly concern to bring the authentic music from Shakespeare’s own day into the production. The BBC also used 125 feet of film to support the televised script. The cast included 24 principals plus extras, and the cost came to £2,343 – a considerable sum in 1953.

The entire 90 minute recording was sadly wiped by the BBC. However, the original typescript for this production still exists and is kept at The Birmingham Shakespeare Library.

Story Synopsis

One of Sylvius’ most notable attributes is his eloquence and proficiency in the language of love. Throughout the play, he delivers impassioned speeches and sonnets, pouring out his emotions and baring his soul. Sylvius’ poetic nature adds depth and beauty to his character, showcasing his ability to express himself with grace and sincerity.

However, his poetic declarations of love are often met with ridicule and mockery from other characters, particularly from the court jester, Touchstone. Despite this, Silvius remains undeterred, clinging to his ideals of love and devotion.

*In Shakespeare’s original play, Sylvius is spelt ‘Silvius’,