BROUGHT TO BOOK

Written by Alex Thorpe

Have you ever read a really good book which the vast majority of people concur with you over, but then you spot a really peevish review that has you wondering if the person responsible for it has read the same thing as you?

I bought Tina Wyngarde-Hopkins biography/memoir, ‘Peter Wyngarde: A Life Amongst Strangers‘ on the day of publication in February 2020. I read the whole thing; all 532 pages in just two sitting as I just found it too compelling to put down. With hand on heart I can say it is the best book of its kind I’ve ever read. It’s candid, detailed and honest; written from the standpoint of someone who actually knew Wyngarde intimately. Ms. Wyngarde-Hopkins has taken further steps in publishing many of the documents referred to in the book (see the A Life Amongst Strangers Companion) and provided strong supporting evidence in the form of Peter’s letters and personal writings (see You’ve Read The Book… Now Read It In Peter’s Own Words ). I know of no other author who has done this.

With this in mind, I’ve been stunned to read some of the nonsense posted online by persons unknown about the book in so-called ‘reviews’. I say this because none of the people who have written this stuff appear to have any real conviction in what they’re saying. Why? Because they choose not to put their real names to it,

I know what you’re all thinking: ‘Everyone is entitled to an opinion’, and you’re right. The Oxford English Dictionary’s definition of the noun ‘Opinion’ goes something like this: “A view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge”. I ask you to keep the final section of that sentence in mind as you read the following ‘review’ for ‘A Life Amongst Strangers’ which was posted on Amazon on 27th December 2023 by someone calling his or her self ‘City Bookworm’:

I’ll take a wild stab in the dark here and say that dear old ‘City Bookworm’ probably never came within a 100 mile radius of PW or anyone who knew him, but is sufficiently conceited to shout down “the person who knew him best” (a description given to Tina Wyngarde-Hopkins by Flash Gordon himself, Sam J. Jones). We now seem to be living in a world where there are no longer facts, only opinions. What is being created is a wholesale denial of truth in almost every sphere of life. We suddenly find ourselves in a situation where people with absolutely no authority, personal experience or knowledge of a subject are attempting to beat down those that have. 

With very special thanks to Pam, Tina and Thomas of the Official Peter Wyngarde Appreciation Society

I’M IN LOVE WITH MY CAR(S)

The cars listed below are in order of when Peter owned them, and not when they were made.

1951 JOWETT ‘JUPITER’

“While appearing in ‘Hamlet’ in London, my friend and fellow actor, Andrew Faulds, would often tootle around Hyde Park in the Jowett picking up birds.” Peter Wyngarde

0-60 in 16.5 seconds

Top Speed: 145mph

N.B. This isn’t the exact car that Peter owned.

1931 STUDEBAKER DICTATOR

1939 LAGONDA DROPHEADRAPIDE

Colour: Green

0-60 in 8.9 seconds

Top Speed: 110mph

Peter purchased this car from the nephew of A.A. Milne – author of the Pooh Bear books.

Colour: White

0-60 in 12 seconds

Top Speed: 107mph

Colour: Red

0-60 in 12 seconds

Top Speed: 109mph

Peter purchased this car with the fee he received for the film ‘Night of the Eagle/Burn, Witch, Burn’.

Colour: Iris Blue

0-60 in 19 seconds

Top Speed: 85mph

Photo: Pictured outside Peter’s home in Earls Terrace, London.

1953 BENTLEY R-TYPE CONTINENTAL SPORTS SALOON

Colour: Black

0-60 in 13.2 seconds

Top Speed: 101.7mph

Colour: Maroon

0-60 in 13 seconds

Top Speed: 105mph

Photo: Peter in his beloved Bristol

Colour: Racing Green

0-60 in 9.1 seconds

Top Speed: 114mph

Photo: Pictured outside Peter’s home in Earls Terrace, London.

Colour: Red

0-60 in 7.8

Top Speed: 110mph

Photo: Pictured at Bisley Shooting Range, Woking.

1984 Porsche 911

Colour: White

0-60 in 3.9 seconds

Top Speed: 205

_________________________________

ARTICLE

“The consumption of this disguised racing car is limited; around 13 litres per 100 kilometres is not too much for a 122 hp engine, with the help of which the Seven effortlessly shows it’s rear to more powerful sports cars…”

CHECKMATE: Errors and Suspicions

By Tina Wyngarde-Hopkins

Having watched Checkmate countless times over the years, I’ve come to the conclusion that the plan to escape was not No.6’s own, but that of the Authorities – perhaps to prove to him that escaped from The Village was impossible, and that any future attempts would therefore be futile. Let’s look at the evidence:

As the story begins, we see the Villagers is taking part in a game of human chess. Although the three opening moves a standard, the fourth: ‘Knight to Knight’s Bishop’ is rather bemusing, which begs the question – if black represents authority, might that be an indication of their ability to change the rules at will?

We are then introduced to the enigmatic ‘Man with the Stick’, who blatantly grabs the attention of No.6 by ignoring the sudden presence of Rover while all the other villagers remain perfectly still. Surely if he had not been working on the side of the authorities, he’d have been attacked without question? Having made the acquaintance of this gentleman, No.6 is informed that if an escape plan is to be successful, then he must first distinguish between “black and white” – meaning, between Prisoner and Guardian. No.6 is told that this might be achieved by judging the attitude of each individual, suggesting that the more assertive among their number must therefore be Guardians.

Initially, he decides to apply this test to ‘The Rook’ (No.58), who had dared to make a move on his own initiative during the chess game the previous day. Having perceived that ‘The Rook’ is an individualist, No.6 feels that he is someone in whom he can confide. This was of course his first major mistake since No.58, having undergone rehabilitation at the hands of No.2, is himself intimidated by No.6’s apparent air of authority and is convinced that he is a Guardian.

Having been specifically sought out to attend the so-called “rehabilitation” session at the hospital, I suspect that No.6, and not ‘The Rook’, was the main subject of No.2’s experiment. By observing No.6’s reactions to number No.58’s apparent distress, No.2 may have learned much more about his guest’s behavioural patterns than might have otherwise been allowed. By subliminally pointing him in the direction of ‘The Rook’, No.2 had already begun to take control of the game.

As No.6 busies himself with his recruitment of more villagers ‘The Rook’, fearing that he himself may be implicated, presumably decides to betrays his new comrade by reporting his movements to No.2. This, of course, was exactly what had been expected.

Meanwhile, No.6’s continued rejection of ‘The Queen’ might’ve proved to be his second fatal error. If we are to assume that the story is based on the game of chess, then it must be accepted that ‘The Queen’ is the most powerful piece on the board, if only for her great mobility – i.e. she can move as far as she likes along any horizontal, vertical or diagonal line. Perhaps if No.6 had had a less arrogant, chauvinistic attitude toward her, he may have realised this. Ergo, she just might have proven to be his greatest ally(?).

Might we also speculate that by sending ‘The Queen’. out to openly pursue No.6, No.2 had, in effect, satisfied his quarry’s expectations, and had thus thrown him off his game?

Since the men in the Control Room appeared to be taking the radio message regarding the supposed plane crash as fact, it becomes apparent that No.2 was working alone. It’s at this point that No.6 fails to consider the possibility of a patrol of the coastal perimeter. He also fails to question the somewhat convenient positioning of the MS Polotska when broadcasting his Mayday. In his role as the grandmaster, and with the assistance of ‘The Rook’, No.2 is able to predict each and every move that No.6 will make in advance, and having placed his chess pieces perfectly on the board, No.6 soon to find himself in check!

The most puzzling incident of all, however, is the look of absolute astonishment on No.6’s face when he sees No.2 on the two-way monitor and realises that The Polotska is in fact their ship. Surely for a man of such intelligence and biting suspicion, the possibility must have occurred to him?

Checkmate!

In Conclusion

This episode, which was the first of the series in which No.6 was not seen as the only individualist in The Village, demonstrates how efficient and effective the authority’s surveillance systems were – proving how unlikely the possibility of escape is.

We also learn of a huge flaw in the make-up of No.6 character – that being his loss of reason when presented with what he considers to be a sure-fire means of escape. For someone so naturally suspicious, he certainly appeared to take ‘The Man With The Stick’ at his word. Clearly No.2 knew No.6 somewhat better than he knew himself, and he used that knowledge to teach his unruly ‘guest’ a lesson.

Anyone for a game of chess?

Facts & Figures

  • Checkmate (or ‘The Queen’s Pawn’ as was its original title), was the third episode of The Prisoner to be shot. Filming began on Saturday 17th September, 1966 at Portmerion in North Wales, but Peter only took up residence in ‘The Green Dome’ some six weeks later at the beginning of November. All his scenes were filmed at Elstree Studios in Hertfordshire.
  • Part of the set seen in Checkmate was originally constructed for the making of the war film, The Dirty Dozen, which had been shot at Elstree earlier in the same year.
  • Although Checkmate was one of the earliest episodes of the series to be recorded, it was the 9th episode to be broadcast in Britain, and the 11th in the USA.
  • The karate chop that Peter executes as No.2, was totally authentic, and had been rehearsed behind closed doors for weeks prior to filming.
  • Checkmate was the only episode of The Prisoner to show an interior view of the sinister Watchtower.
  • Peter once said that the most nerve-racking part of playing No.2 was Patrick McGoohan’s insistence that he played the character as himself!
  • In a recent poll in Six of One – The Prisoner Appreciation Society magazine – Checkmate came runner up only to Arrival in a vote of favourite episodes.
  • One of the most puzzling comments in the episode comes from ‘The Man With Stick’, who congratulates No.6 on playing a “fine game of chess”. The fact that No.6 had merely been a lowly Pawn and had moved just two squares, didn’t appear to concern him!
  • The only memento that Peter kept from his all-too-brief appearance in the series were the plimsolls he wore as No.2.
  • Prisoner expert, Roger Langley, lists Peter amongst his top 20 favourite actors from the series, which boasts over 200 individual performers. He says the smooth but cold No.2: “Portrayed by Wyngarde fights to keep himself under control. The nearest we see to a show of aggression is the splitting of a plank by a deft karate blow. The village leader, with his scarf draped across his shoulder, could be a college professor. He is well-spoken, well-mannered and obviously well-bred. He is full of charm, but appears capable of applying whatever degree of force might be needed. Wyngarde capably brings off a performance of a man who will use his own disciplined methods to exert power over those who would conspire against him”.

Click below for more about ‘Checkmate’…

INTERVIEW: Love Affair

Back on the subject of Jason King, he said.

INTERVIEW: Fabulous 208



INTERVIEW: TV Ekspres

_______________________________________

REVIEW: ‘Timeshift: How to Be Sherlock Holmes, The Many Faces Of A Master Detective’

Broadcast: Monday, 23rd December 2013

Character: Narrator


© Copyright The Hellfire Club: The OFFICIAL PETER WYNGARDE Appreciation Society: https://www.facebook.com/groups/813997125389790/

JASON KING PARODIES

The Two Ronnies Series 3 – Episode 5

Detectives On The Edge Of a Nervous Breakdown Series 7 -Episode 1

Broadcast: 22nd April, 1993. 32 mins.

The Comic Strip was a periodic series of satires and spoofs that helped bring alternative comedy to the mainstream and forge a comedy reputation for then-new Channel 4. The title itself was a parody of the 1988 film, ‘Women On The Verge Of A Nervous Breakdown’.

In a sequel to feature film spin-off, ‘The Bullshitters’ featuring the characters Bonehead and Foyle (for this read Bodie and Doyle of ‘The Professionals), who are called in to solve a 70s-style murder. Unfortunately, so are 70s detectives Shouting George of The Weeney (Jack Regan – ‘The Sweeny’) and Jason Bentley of Department Z (Jason King – Department S), and 90s Northern detective Dave Spanker (Dave Spender – ‘Spender’).

Jason Bentley, played by Peter Richardson, owns a 1970s retro clothes shop called Flares ‘R’ Us and, of course, drives a Bentley Continental at a very sedate, unhurried speed, as he’d portrayed here as having claret in one had (Jason King never drank Claret, as his favourite tipples were vintage Champagne or Stornoway Whisky). Nevertheless, he rues the day when drinking in such a way might be made illegal.

Peter Richardson as Jason Bentley

When it comes to solving crimes, Bentley prefers to make no visible effort at all, as he anticipates that all the plot devices required to solve the case will arrive by themselves in due course.

Jeremy Clarkson Promotional Film

Filmed: Friday, 8th May, 2015

Presenter, Jeremy Clarkson, donned a false moustache and a garish pink cravat to shoot a short sequence to publicise his up-coming arena tour of the UK, and paid homage to Jason King with his ‘Jason Clarkson’ send-up.

Clarkson had become a free agent following his high-profile departure from BBC show ‘Top Gear’, was seen jumping from his vintage Jensen sports car – another seventies throwback – and rolling across a large mat as a camera crew filmed close by.

WHAT A CARD!

Unstoppable Cards: Complete ‘The Prisoner’ Series.

Unstoppable: ‘The Saint’ Autograph Collection

Wizkids

Strictly Ink: ‘Doctor Who’ Collection

BEHIND THE SCENES ON ‘NIGHT OF THE EAGLE/BURN, WITCH, BURN’

Above: Janet Blair with Lochanvir the Eagle and his trainer the Eagle

Above: This scene featuring Peter, Janet Blair and Margaret Johnson was cut from the final edit

(iii) It is 7.30am, and the cast and crew have boarded a bus which is heading to Taplow in Buckinghamshire, which is to double as the village of Hempnell.

The main shot of the day will involve Peter crossing a narrow road near his fictional home, as he makes his way to the college after what had proved to be an eventful weekend.

The scene calls for Peter to step out into the road just as a large van comes into view around a sharp bend, and almost hits the visibly shaken Professor.

Sidney Hayers discusses the sequence with Peter – advising that he would prefer to use a stunt double. But when Peter insists on doing his own stunts wherever possible, Hayers decides to shoot the piece in close-up as opposed to the original long-shot. A short debate is had between Peter, Hayers and the Stunt Coordinator, during which Peter is assured that he will be perfectly safe.

(It should be noted at this point that it was Hayers’ who was certain that Peter wouldn’t hit the camera lens with a projectile in an earlier scene, only to have been proved disastrously wrong!)

To be on the safe side, Hayers orders a dummy run in order to ensure the safety of his leading man, but as the time of the actual ‘Take’ draws ever closer, the Stunt Coordinator begins to show increasing signs of doubt.

As Hayers calls for order on the set, Peter takes up his position on the pavement on the opposite side of the road to the College entrance. Right on cue, the van rounds the bend, but as Peter steps out, the HGV passes much closer than had originally been expected, and clips Peter. Thankfully, a quick check by on-set medical staff confirms that he hasn’t been badly injured, and he’s given the all clear to carry on.

(iv) Director Hayers appears to have chosen the coldest day of the year to take the cast and crew to a Cornish beach, where several crucial scenes are to be shot

Above: Peter and the crew filming on the cliffs at Porthcurno Beach, Cornwall

Peter is put through his paces high up on a steep cliff face, where he’s instructed by Hayers to both climb and descend some dangerous-looking rocks, over and over again until the Director is happy with the ‘Take’. A longshot is then added of Peter running along a deserted stretch of beach in broad daylight, that was later given the effect of being filmed around midnight.

Meanwhile, Peter’s co-star, Janet Blair, concludes her scenes on the beach, where she’s sprayed with water as she’s seen to be walking from the waves. Once the Director is happy with the shot, Ms Blair is brought dry clothes and is allowed to change into them.

(v) For one particular sequences in the film, Sidney Hayers chose to use a 9mm lens to show the action from Janet Blair’s dazed point of view. During the early Sixties, the zoom lens was hardly ever used in film-making, and so Night of the Eagle became a forerunner for the particular technique.

One of the scenes where this method was used was during the sequence at the cliff-top cottage, where Tansy is coming out of her trance. She opens her eyes to find Peter and a doctor looking down at her. Hayers said that he’d used the method to distort the two men’s faces – i.e. to elongate their noses, giving them the look of an eagle.

Peter, however, didn’t share Hayers’ view of the shots, and was none too pleased with the result. When he eventually saw the ‘Rushes’ of that day’s filming, he apparently yelled: “Sidney, you’re not going to use that! For God’s sake!” He did!

Peter and members of the crew on the cliffs at Pedn Vounder Beach